|
I have long been concerned with science’s failure to notice some of the
key expressions of intelligence. I do not know what the reasons for
these extraordinary oversights are, although
natural science’s indifference to the facts of human nature and the facility
confidence which
‘nothing but’ arguments are bandied about that eliminate problems by brushing them under
the intellectual carpet probably have a lot to do with it.
So here, in
epigrammatic form, are some basic propositions that I believe need
explaining. In some cases the same point could be extended to any
intelligent life form, but I do not believe that that fact detracts from
science's abject failure to recognise, let alone explain, the phenomenon
itself.
These aphorisms do not imply any break with natural science, but they
certainly take more explaining than the sciences have deigned to offer
them so far. And of course, these are precisely the topics this website
is concerned with.
-
Many organisms change. Only
human beings have history.
-
There is no biological
difference between me and a Cro-Magnon man. Yet the real difference
between us is so great that no reasonable evolutionist would
classify us in the same species.
-
Only human beings are afraid
of death. Or life. Only human beings try to explain life. Or
death.
-
We should accept the
intelligence of other species when, and because, they present their
case themselves.
-
The most rational defence
against neo-Darwinism's Just So stories is not argument but
laughter.
-
I last shared a common
ancestor with my fellow primates six
million back; with dolphins ninety million; and with the African grey parrot
two hundred million years ago. In between? Not an inkling of reason. But
neo-Darwinians say they can explain the intelligence we all share. Who says they have no
sense of humour?
-
Intelligent life can no more
be explained without history and consciousness than life in general
without evolution or heredity.
-
Mark Twain once observed
that only human beings blush. Or need to. Explain.
-
Faith and fundamentalism
mean that God gave us reason on the condition that we did not use
it. He might as well have asked us to live with our eyes shut.
-
Asking a biologist to
explain human history is like asking a butcher to explain the world
food industry.
-
How is it possible to ask
the question 'How is it possible?'?
-
A human being is no more
'nothing but' an organism than an organism is 'nothing but' a
chemical reaction.
-
The theory of evolution no
more explains our ability to theorise evolution than the theory of
relativity explains Einstein.
-
Neo-Darwinism shares with
behaviourism, vulgar Marxism and Freudianism the conclusion that it
is impossible to know whether something is simply true or
false. As such, it is the antithesis of science.
-
I am intelligent because I
can ask whether I am intelligent.
-
If there is no qualitative
difference between intelligence in particular and life in general,
then pets are slaves, meat is murder and the dog, the tulip and the
paramecium are our ethical peers.
-
It takes a truly intelligent being
to do something truly stupid.
-
We share 99% of our genes
with chimpanzees. And about 1% of our way of life. In what way is
New York like a nest, is a global economy like foraging or are nuclear
weapons like a branch torn off to make a club? In what sense does
any gene-count explain any of that?
-
I do not know whether human
reason is capable of achieving absolute objectivity. But I do know
that it is capable of dreaming of it. And that is enough to separate
it absolutely from unreason of every kind.
ñ |